President Thomas S. Monson, our beloved prophet, challenges you to obtain a testimony in the following statement:. In order for us to be examples of the believers, we ourselves must believe. Our testimonies are no doubt of varying degrees. It is up to each of us to develop the faith necessary to survive spiritually and to project a light for others to see. Amidst the confusion of our age, the conflicts of conscience and the turmoil of daily living, an abiding faith becomes an anchor to our lives.
Among the most effective ways to gain and keep the faith we need would be to read and study the scriptures and to pray frequently and consistently. Brothers and sisters, have you read the Book of Mormon? Have you put to the test the promise found in Moroni chapter 10, verse 4, asking your Heavenly Father with a sincere heart, with real intent and having faith in Christ whether or not that which is found in that book is truth? To gain a testimony, he suggests that you develop and increase your faith, read and study the scriptures, pray frequently and consistently, and read the Book of Mormon and put to the test the promise of Moroni.
Are you doing these things? I know that as a student you are very busy with your studies, homework, and examinations. We want you to excel academically.
Some of you have part-time employment to provide for your education. Others of you are married with family responsibilities. I know that you are busy. But do not be so busy in these matters that you neglect to obtain, nourish, and strengthen your testimony. Faithful church attendance and service is essential. Attend your block meetings.
Partake of the sacrament each week. Serve in a church calling when called. With the nearness of the new and beautiful Rexburg Idaho Temple, participate in temple ordinances regularly and consistently.
I WAS TOLD IT WAS JESUS
As they were doing this very intense study, the 76th section describes the process with the following phrases:. We, Joseph Smith, Jun. By the power of the Spirit our eyes were opened and our understandings were enlightened, so as to see and understand the things of God—. And while we meditated upon these things, the Lord touched the eyes of our understandings and they were opened, and the glory of the Lord shone round about.
And we beheld the glory of the Son, on the right hand of the Father, and received of his fullness. You see the pattern Joseph and Sidney followed; they were in the spirit and their eyes were open to understand the things of God. They meditated over the truths of the gospel. Through this process, Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon received one of the most beautiful testimonies of Jesus Christ ever recorded in scripture. We further read in section And now, after the many testimonies which have been given of him, this is the testimony, last of all, which we give of him: That he lives!
For we saw him, even on the right hand of God; and we heard the voice bearing record that he is the Only Begotten of the Father —. That by him, and through him, and of him, the worlds are and were created, and the inhabitants thereof are begotten sons and daughters unto God. Now, I am not suggesting that you will have an experience similar to that had by Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon. In conclusion, I have challenged you to obtain a strong and enduring testimony of Jesus Christ while you are a student at this university.
I have offered three suggestions to help you. First, know that through the condescension of Jesus Christ, He came to this earth as an infant and fulfilled the mission of the Father. He knows all that you experience. He loves you.
- "But Whom Say Ye That I Am?"?
- Original Audience.
- IB Chemistry: 19 Redox processes Revision Notes (Higher Level supplement) (IB Chemistry Revision Notes Book 17)!
They left what is known today as Messianic prophecies. Isaiah, in chapter 53, was one of the most accurate and descriptive of all the prophets in testifying of the coming of Jesus Christ. The dominant paradigm reigning in academic biblical studies today is marked by radical discontinuity. Others, of course, applaud them, finding that such radical reconstructions get them off the hook with the traditional Jesus and the Church. Gone is the Jesus who saves us, replaced by a Jesus who either affirms us, or is ultimately irrelevant, or who encourages whatever vague spirituality is du jour.
Presentations – BYU–Idaho
In either case, they are presented with a reconstruction in which Jesus is alone, cut off, isolated—divorced from Judaism, from the Old Testament, from the Gospels, from the Church. The real Jesus, radical reconstructions insist, is some sort of mystic, or revolutionary, or Cynic, or teacher, or prophet, whose Judaism is incidental and irrelevant at best and who has been hidden—often deliberately—by the later dogma of the Church, even by the biblical Gospels themselves.
By contrast, traditional Christianity whether Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, or fundamentalist sees Jesus in terms of continuity. In broad strokes, he fulfills the Old Testament promises, and the Gospels of the Church however conceived faithfully record eyewitness accounts of His Virgin Birth, miracles, prophecy, and teaching, his sacrificial death, his bodily resurrection, as well as his commissioning of the apostles to go and make disciples of all nations. The dominant paradigm reigning in academic biblical studies today was developed largely by German scholars of a Lutheran confessional persuasion in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Strauss suggested the disciples made up almost everything in the Gospels out of Jewish legends, while Rudolf Bultmann claimed not only that the Old Testament could not be considered Scripture for Christians and thus irrelevant for understanding Jesus but also that most everything in the Gospels was a post-Easter retrojection back into the life of Jesus and thus that we can know next to nothing about the historical Jesus.
The dominant paradigm reigning in academic biblical studies today, being developed originally by Germans prior to the horrors of the Holocaust, is also laden with anti-Catholicism and anti-Semitism of a genteel but not necessarily virulent sort. While some like Bultmann did join the Confessing Church and oppose the Nazis, others like von Harnack were busy finding ways to deny Jewish scholars important professorships.
In any event, to enlightened German Lutheran eyes, Judaism and Catholicism were cut from the same cloth. They belonged to the old world of sacrifice and ritual which the Reformation and its child the Enlightenment had buried forever. It would be inconceivable to such scholars that common, normal Judaism could inform our understanding of Jesus or earliest Christianity—this is why Germans excelled at exploring Greco-Roman backgrounds—or that Jesus and the earliest Church could be understood in Catholic terms. The greatest contemporary popular exponent of the dominant paradigm today is Dr.
Bart Ehrman, Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, a former fundamentalist whose forays into textual criticism made him a liberal Christian for a time but ultimately an unbeliever. A friendly convivial fellow and a serious, sober scholar, neither an anti-Catholic nor anti-Semite, Ehrman has sold millions of books popularizing the paradigm of discontinuity in several books, in which he endeavors to show the Gospels are unreliable and that Jesus was an apocalyptic prophet far different from the Jesus Christ the Church has worshipped as divine son of God.
Full disclosure: I wrote a positive blurb of an advance draft of the book. Indeed, he begins with an Anglican, the famous C. And so Pitre offers a tour-de-force showing that the Gospels do indeed do so. The book falls into two parts. In the first chapters , after an introductory chapter , Pitre argues that the Gospels are reliable, presenting eyewitness testimony to Jesus.
In the second chapters , Pitre dives deep into Gospel passages and Old Testament Scripture as well as Jewish tradition to show that Jesus claimed to be Son of Man, Messiah, and God, and that Jesus crucifixion matters and his resurrection happened.
A chapter of evangelical challenge to the reader concludes the work. Pitre first demonstrates that the Gospels were not anonymous, as claimed by representatives of the radical paradigm.
JESUS THE CHRIST
Not one anonymous copy of a Gospel exists. Every single manuscript of the Gospels has a title with a name; any variations e. There is no convincing argument to explain why if the Gospels were originally anonymous they took the names they did, particularly in the cases of Mark and Luke, who were not themselves eyewitnesses. By contrast, truly anonymous documents, like the Letter to the Hebrews in the New Testament, evince diversity in the manuscript tradition where certain copies are attributed to this author say, Timothy or that author say, Paul , and the later Church has actual debates about who might have written it.
No such debates surround the authorship of the Gospels, Pitre observes, and he moves in the next chapter to show that traditional authorship of the Gospels—Ss. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John authoring the Gospels that bear their names—is not only plausible but compelling. Matthew Levi, a tax collector, was one of the twelve apostles who could probably write, while Mark was John Mark, associate of Peter and Paul, and Luke was indeed St.
Luke the physician, traveling companion of St. In many ways it might seem that Pitre is simply defending premodern tradition regarding the authorship of the Gospels. Several people held up their lighters at the end. Little children, let no man deceive you: he that does righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous. He that commits sin is of the devil; for the devil sinned from the beginning.
For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil. We are not to imitate the devils kids!
http://www.stuwebsports.com/wp-content/forks/3680.php This is why the word instructs us to; 1 Timothy Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto you art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses. Bob Dylan did sell his soul to the devil… For his fame! He did walk away from the music industry for a while and found Christ but had to return due to the contract he made with the devil!
People need to wake up this happens in the music industry! For him to be truly saved he has to repent and live for Christ!